Book Recommendation: Kingdom Race Theology

Book Recommendation: Kingdom Race Theology

 

There is a deep tension in our society right now when it comes to the issue of race and racial relations. Up until recently, I have found many of the methods to identify and answer these questions to be severely wanting. They would either deny there is a problem or take the problem so far as to think racism permeates every single part of life, separating people into classes originally devised by Marxist ideology.

So what are we to do? How can we address these questions thoughtfully and realistically while still remaining faithful to the framework of Scripture? One thing the dominant perspective gets right is stating that there is a problem. The thing it fails to do is offer the only true answer to the problem: the ultimate atonement for sin on the cross.

In Tony Evans’s book, he lays things out frankly and honestly. He does not pull punches in seeing how the Bible addresses the issues of racial tension we are seeing today. And this goes for both sides of the aisle. Racism is real, and it does exist, and those who are followers of Jesus deny the basic reality of a person being an image bearer if they are racist. There is no room for racism in God’s Kingdom. Likewise, he leaves no room for those who seek to divide us by our melanin levels, as is with the derivatives of critical theory. He shows that in the gospel, there is a unity in Christ that bridges all divides and brings true reconciliation.

At the end, there is a provided list, particularly for black and white Christians, of serious questions to be considered. I found it challenging and hopeful. While it certainly pressed points of things I have not considered before, it is done wholly in the love and grace of Jesus, and it does so for both lists. Whoever reads it will feel challenged to do better and to love more.

I highly recommend this book. It provides a path forward that is not found at the whims of questionable philosophical origins and frameworks, and is wholly built upon the transformative power of the gospel. Unlike some of the other options that are out there to wholly focus on what makes us different and always left me feeling misunderstood or angered, Evans’s take points us ultimately to the cross that reconciles us all together to God. If the divide of sin and death could be resolved, so can our divisions over race as well.

You can find the book here – https://a.co/d/aT1WgNE

can I be plucked?

can I be plucked?

 

One of my favorite songs
of all time is In Christ Alone written by the Getty’s. In its last verse
comes a very rousing theme of being secure in Christ.

 

No guilt in life, no fear
in death—

This is the pow’r of
Christ in me;

From life’s first cry to
final breath,

Jesus commands my destiny.

No pow’r of hell, no
scheme of man,

Can ever pluck me from His
hand;

Till He returns or calls
me home—

Here in the pow’r of
Christ I’ll stand.

 

“No power of hell, no
scheme of man can ever pluck me from His hand.” In a previous church context I
was a part of I was told we could not sing that 4th verse because of that
particular line which struck the pastor as “too reformed” for his comfort, and to
not have to deal with whatever issues would come from a line like that, we
could sing all the verses but that one. 

I sadly didn’t push back
more at that time. I should have. Unfortunately in our day and age the concept
of perseverance of the saints has been relegated by many to be only a doctrine
of the Reformed tradition. I argue it is not. While the Wesleyan Arminian take
on the doctrine may be somewhat different, the core element is the same. If we
are found in Christ, we are secure in Him. This thought is directly talked of
in Romans 8:38b-39, “Neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither
our fears for today nor our worries about tomorrow—not even the powers of hell
can separate us from God’s love. 39 No power in the sky above or in the earth
below—indeed, nothing in all creation will ever be able to separate us from the
love of God that is revealed in Christ Jesus our Lord.” 

Nothing is ever able to
take us from God’s hand. If we remain in Christ then we are secure in Him. Of
course, we can choose to walk out of His hand if we so choose. The question can
then be raised, “what does it mean to be found in Christ?” Simply put it can be
asked, Am I, having recognized the truth of the gospel, that Jesus alone is my
hope for  salvation by His death and resurrection and no works of my own,
and through the enabling power of His Holy Spirit I am living as a
representative of Christ and His Kingdom, allegiant to Him alone. If the answer
is yes to that question, truly and honestly then you are found in Christ. 

How does this look in
practice? We are all human. We suffer and struggle with the reality of our
fallen humanity. Maybe there is a habit that we have desperately been asking
the Lord to break in us. Does that mean I am not saved if I stumble and fall?
The question is, like King David after his sin concerning Bathsheba and Uriah:
do I remain loyal to the Lord alone? Unlike the other Kings in Israel’s history
before their captivity, they would start worshiping other idols. Even though
David horrifically sinned, he remained loyal to God. 

So as we look at our own
lives, we may have times where we stumble and fall (I certainly have in my
past). But, if we remain loyal to Christ, pursuing Him and getting back up
again with His help we will be found in Him and persevere no matter what comes against
us. No power of hell, or scheme of man can ever pluck us from His hand!

 

How Does He Get Us?

How Does He Get Us?

A lot of buzz has been going around the Christian internet sphere
about the recent ad campaign from “He Gets Us”. I have seen a lot
of posts from people who are either for or against the campaign. For
myself personally I think they both have valid points.

For the against
crowd their focus is on the lack of a repentance message. Ultimately,
no matter how you parse it the core of the Gospel is that we are to
turn to Christ, repent, and follow Him in the new life He offers. If
we leave this out (even under the guise of pre-evangelism),
people may think that following Jesus can happen without a change.
That change can only truly come from the power of the Holy Spirit
working in our lives. Through prevenient grace, God opens our eyes to
our need for repentance to make the choice to ask Christ to forgive
us, and then we begin to follow Him. Demonstrating our allegiance to
our King in every aspect of our lives. I do also share some of the
political leaning concerns as well. The messaging that is presented
does utilize imagery and hints towards a more progressive liberal
political message that is hard to separate from what they are trying
to do. The definition of “hate” in our modern world really means,
“you don’t agree or accept how I live my life, so you hate me!”
That is not the definition of hate, and utilizing that definition,
then Jesus would be called a hater for calling people out of their
sin. Not making them comfortable in it.

On the other hand,
there is room to agree with some of the heart that this particular
campaign is getting at. From my perspective many in the Evangelical
world have traded gospel witness for political activity. This is not
to say we shouldn’t be involved in politics. We are to be! But it
seems that for some the primary method of bringing about change has
turned to political mechanisms, rather than the Great Commission.
Instead of proclaiming Christ as King and having our hope in Him,
some seem to ascribe messianic power to the presidency of whoever is
their candidate of choice (be it Republican or Democrat). As
Christians our method of impacting the world around us never has
been, and never will be politics…rather transformed hearts. When we
trade God’s Kingdom for setting up our own it leads to tyranny,
injustice and death. Because of much of this many’s discourse has
become very militant and unloving. Rather than presenting the gospel,
we also throw in whichever partisan politics we want to see
established.

So what are we to
do?

Balance and wisdom
are needed. Any gospel preached without repentance is not actually
good news because it does not solve our greatest human need.
Salvation. Likewise, we are to love and be gracious. Jesus didn’t
demand the Zealots or Pharisees to join the others movement, but
rather to follow Him and sin no more. We can and should stand firm on
the truth of the gospel, while at the same time being filled with
love and grace towards those who are hurt and broken, in need of
hearing the transforming message of the gospel. Just like all who now
follow Christ did before coming to a saving knowledge of King Jesus.

The washing takes
place, the washing away of our sins.

Jeremiah, A Prophet for Today

Jeremiah, A Prophet for Today

 

I just finished watching The Bible Collection: Jeremiah which is a dramatization of the life and ministry of the weeping prophet Jeremiah. Following his life from a young age, up till just after the destruction of Jerusalem it shows the near impossible situation that he was dealing with. I recommend checking it out as it brings the story to life (Watch The Bible Collection: Jeremiah | Prime Video (amazon.com))


We know Jeremiah was not believed by the leadership of Judah. They had failed to do what they were supposed to. Honor God in all things, and rule justly. The decrepit nature of the nation was becoming more apparent as they were falling into the same behaviors that landed the northern kingdom of Israel into exile. It is from this place that Judah was conquered, and the entire time Jeremiah went unheeded. His calls for repentance and justice fell on deaf ears.


The parallels seem to be deafening to our current day in various ways. While we don’t have the intertwining of faith and politics that existed in the OT period of Judah, there still is influence that has been missing. Since the early 19th century, much of the American Church has gotten so enthralled with “getting out of dodge” when it comes to our eschatology. Why does it matter what goes on here if we are going to be raptured up anyways! That or any other number of variations of the same idea. Instead of being the Kingdom of God on the earth transforming the creation through the spreading of the gospel we become so internalized with ourselves, and this has led to so much rot. 


The Church in many places has left our mandate to take care of the orphan and widow to the government. We all can certainly agree this is a less than ideal situation. But as we know history doesn’t always repeat itself, but it certainly does rhyme. This abrogation of our responsibility has led to what we have. A more often than not overbearing government that regularly interacts outside of its Constitutional bounds to “take care of us”. If we are truly desiring justice to prevail, we in the Church must take up the mantle and example of the Early Church. 


What would happen if that changed? If the incentives were corrected and people looked to God’s people for what they were supposed to do as part of their mission of restoring creation through the spreading of the gospel. 


Jeremiah 3:12-13, “O Israel, my faithless people, come home to me again, for I am merciful. I will not be angry with you forever. Only acknowledge your guilt. Admit that you rebelled against the Lord your God and committed adultery against him by worshiping idols under every green tree. Confess that you refused to listen to my voice. I, the Lord, have spoken!

What is Orthodoxy, and other questions

What is Orthodoxy, and other questions

What does it mean to be orthodox? I don’t really mean part of the Eastern Orthodox churches that came from the Great Schism many centuries ago. What does it mean to be inside of the big tent of acceptable Christian theology?

As a start we know that to be inside of orthodoxy there must be some core things affirmed that are essential to the gospel

The Gospel: An Outline 

1. Jesus preexisted with the Father, 

2. took on human flesh, fulfilling God’s promises to David, 

3. died for sins in accordance with the Scriptures, 

4. was buried, 

5. was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures, 

6. appeared to many, 

7. is seated at the right hand of God as Lord, and 

8. will come again as judge.

By this we know that there are certain groups who fall outside of this definition of the gospel such as Mormonism and Jehovah’s Witness’ who deny key elements of Christ’s divinity and what His work on the cross accomplished. In most parts of the Church these are considered first-tier issues. These are undeniable elements of calling yourself a follower of Christ. Roger Olson makes this point in his book about the variety of Chrisitan beliefs when he says, “If “Christianity” is compatible with any and every truth claim, it is meaningless. It would then be indistinguishable from, say, Buddhism or atheism. Truly it would be chaotic, shapeless and devoid of identity. Christian thinkers and leaders have always recognized this and have sought to identify a core of essential Christian beliefs that all mature, capable Christians must affirm in order to be considered truly Christian. There must be a distinguishing border between what is Chrisitan and what is not. If there is no line, then Christianity means nothing as Olson points out. 

But what about those other pesky issues that seem really important as well? This is where things can get really messy. Across the board there are doctrines held dear by many Christians that seem to come into regular conflict. Some of these are things like, are the gifts of the Holy Spirit still in operation, women in ministry, Arminianism vs Calvinism, creation and age of the earth, what do the end times look like, and the list can go on and on.

So how do we handle these issues? 

The question we must ask is, does this particular issue strike at the core of not just the gospel, but it’s very foundation. I can look at the Calvinism vs Arminianism debate and see well-made arguments on both sides, and also can understand the possibility of weaknesses in my own position. But in that I am still able to be in fellowship, be encouraged and grow with my brothers and sisters who hold to strong reformed doctrine. There are many pastors and theologians who are ardent Calvinists that I very much appreciate, and I have no issue listening to their sermons or reading their books.

We then have a different category of issues. These are those that strike at not just the core of Chrisitan belief, but the foundation of them. In our day and age, we know that this primary issue is that of sexuality and marriage. Why is this issue so different? We don’t see the difference between man and women, or what marriage is listed directly in any creed or explanation of the gospel. But, in everything that is foundational to that core belief is how God has established them. All throughout Scripture God likens His relationship with His people (physical Israel in the OT, and the Church in the NT) to marriage. He has the groom, and the Church as His Bride. We see in Scripture and in nature how God has instilled different aspects of who He is into both men and women. As a general note, I see both men and women fully equal in the image of God. That being said, there does seem to be general temperamental differences between men and women that do come into play. Men are just as capable as women to be nurturing, though it seems women tend to generally be more predisposed towards this characteristic. The term “motherly instinct” is something seen around the world regardless of culture, so there’s something there. 

So, when I hear someone say that “faithful Christians can disagree on sexuality and marriage”, the question that I have heard posed that I will ask is, faithful to what? We can have our disagreements on a whole litany of issues. But when it comes to something as foundational as sexuality and marriage, that is treading into waters that go deep to the heart of the foundations of how God has created all things. Because of this, I see the question of sexuality and marriage within the Church to be something that if not grounded in the classic Christian consensus as something that puts a person outside of Christian orthodoxy. How I interact with a person on this issue then is greatly dependent if they “are a Christian” or if they are not. 

For those who are not followers of Jesus you will receive the same love and mercy that Christ showed to all He interacted with in need of a savior, one to redeem the broken lostness all of us were in before Christ. For when we come to Christ, He is our new identity, and source of fulfillment. As we follow and become more like Him, whatever it was we made our concept of who we are should fade away, be it who we are attracted to, the color of our skin or even our favorite hobby.


For those who profess to be followers of Christ, that is a different conversation. No cultural context, or “new understanding” can work its way around the clear distinctions found in the Word. I pray, just as I pray for myself that the light of Christ and the conviction of the Holy Spirit would open our eyes to His way and truth. Holding convictions from Scripture is not unloving. It is truly unloving to say we follow the One who leads us into all truth, but then not do so. His transforming work is effectual to all areas of our life.

May we all have the grace, peace and wisdom of Christ as we move forward.